NEWS: Penguin releases a new hardcover line from it’s ‘Classics’ imprint

Well, old news really, but better late than never.  Actually, it’s something that has managed to drift under the radar to my knowledge, and I see it as my duty to inform other book lovers, as I would certainly appreciate the info.

Penguin books has now released a new sub-series of hardcover bound books from the Penguin Classics imprint.  Initially, eight titles were released in late October, 2009, and all feature jacket design work by Coralie Bickford-Smith.  Smith’s website states that she’s “a senior cover designer at Penguin Books, where she has created several series designs,” and that she studied typography at Reading University.   Smith deserves credit, as it’s a very good-looking line, and all retail for $20.00; but Amazon has them at reduced prices running at about $13.50ish.

I’ve yet to get any hands-on time with any of the books, but clearly I want them, or, at least, some of them.  I’m actually quite a fan of Penguin Classics, and for many, many years it was the specific label that I looked for as it resonated with me as an affordable, not to mention accessible library of genuine merit.  The books cut a large swath through the literary canon, capturing the great works of English-speaking countries, but all the important and recognized works of places such as France and Russia, not to mention ages old historical works from past civilizations such as that of the ancient Greeks.

The House of Penguin, in my opinion, has always centered around their classics.  Do they publish current literature from contemporary authors? I’m sure they do, but I’ll be damned if I can think of even one their new releases.  All I know is that I hunted down that little penguin logo for years and it rarely ever let me down.  Affordable, literate and stylish looking for the shelf; my only complaint was that they were only cheap little paperbacks and some of my best-loved Penguin Classics over the years have turned yellow, and grown very tattered.

(pic. 1_Never has Dangerous Liaisons been such a faithful companion; that little paperback is the most well-worn book in my whole library.)

Now Peguin has taken a marvelous step in the right direction, but my enthusiasm has been somewhat dampened a bit.  Granted, the books themselves look fantastic, and Coralie Bickford-Smith has shown a real knack at making the editions elegant, but with a little bit of an edge over plainer releases.   If the books contain the attention to detail that I’ve always revered in Penguin, then I’ll be pleased.  What I’ve dreamed of for years is some of my favorite releases from them, just simply hardbound.

(pic. 2_One of the new Penguin Classics hardback editions; gorgeous design.)

Will I get my favorites? I don’t know, and that’s where my enthusiasm has really died down a bit.  The selection is bland, with nary a surprise in sight.

The first wave of releases from 2009 is as follows:

Great Expectations, by Charles Dickens

Jane Eyre, by Charlotte Bronte

Pride and Prejudice, by Jane Austen

Sense and Sensibility, by Jane Austen (two Austens!)

Tess Of The D’Urbervilles, by Thomas Hardy

The Picture Of Dorian Gray, by Oscar Wilde

Wuthering Heights, by Emily Bronte

and Cranford, by Elizabeth Gaskell

Amazon has pre-order listings set to hit March 10th, 2010, as follows:

Emma, by Jane Austen (a third!)

Treasure Island, by Robert Louis Stevenson

Alice’s Adventures In Wonderland and Through The Looking Glass, by Lewis Carroll

The Odyssey, by Homer

and Lady Chatterley’s Lover, by D. H. Lawrence

(pic. 3_Homer’s The Odyssey, albeit, the Rieu translation.)

Amazon also has further listings that look like they will release on September 28, 2010:

Little Women, by Louisa May Alcott

The Hound Of The Baskervilles, by Arthur Conan Doyle

Oliver Twist, Charles Dickens

and (in a surprising twist) The Woman In White, by Wilkie Collins

I’m not trying to make a point that any one of the selections isn’t a worthwhile read, but each entry is so by-the-book, if you will, that there isn’t really anything that can’t be picked up in a superior version from something like the Everyman’s Library.  It’s a lot of Jane Austen and Charles Dickens, and some obvious picks like the Jane Eyre and Dorian Gray.  The lone surprise for me is the inclusion of the seemingly little known Woman In White by Wilkie Collins.  I’m also a little surprised at the inclusion of Lady Chatterley’s Lover, as I can think of far more deserving books to be honored from the list of Penguin Classics.

One thing that Penguin seems to do better than any other publishing firm is they seem to either seek out or acquire some of the best translations of ‘foreign’ books I think I’ve ever encountered, but even that’s a bit wasted here.  The one book that would need translating on this list would be Homer’s Odyssey, but it’s the translation done by E. V. Rieu, and while I haven’t had the pleasure of reading that version myself (it’s billed as a Penguin staple), I’m more familiar with the work done by Robert Fagles, who is also within Penguin’s reach as they published his updated versions of both Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey.  I haven’t read the second entry by Fagles, but if it’s anything like his Iliad, then I can’t imagine why Penguin would squander the opportunity to release a beautiful hardcover.  Fagles’ work is available as a deluxe-paperback boxed-set from Penguin, but it would have been nice to see it get the full treatment that it deserves.

Penguin has had a long-standing classic in their clutch with the 1961 translation of Pierre de Laclos’ Les Liaisons Dangereuses, as done by P. W. K. Stone.  Penguin recently published an updated translation by Helen Constantine (October, 2007), and I still haven’t been able to pick up a copy -yet- but I can vouch that the Stone version is incredible; I’ve been reading it for years, and despite seeing publication in the early sixties, it’s still the standard for one of literature’s greatest achievements.  What would I do to get a copy hardbound for keeps? I think I’d consider bartering my very soul, if that’s what it took.  It’s clearly one of the best offerings from Penguin and it’s existence alone puts it’s entire division ahead of everyone else.  (If Penguin happens to read this and wants to grant me my special wish, I’ll send an e-mail attached with my bloody heart and even do carnal tricks to seal it up.  Not kidding.)

(pic. 4_New Penguin edition of Jane Eyre; Jane Eyre really is one of the best books ever.)

And then there’s quite possibly my other biggest wish from Penguin to include Dumas’ The Count Of Monte Cristo in their new line.  Monte Cristo is a bit of a complicated affair, because as often as it’s remembered, people either identify with it through film adaptations (horrors!) or the more commonly acquired abridgments that slice the narrative in half (greater horrors!).  A more complete and updated translation by Robin Buss was published in 1996, and while it’s page-count clocks in at almost 1250, I can attest to the fact that there isn’t a wasted page in the entire volume.  Some time ago I purchased the fairly new Everyman’s edition, that while very striking on the shelf and is a pleasure to read and hold, I’ll still reach for the Penguin version more times than not, as I’ve decided that I’ll settle for Buss and nothing else.

Buss also did another Dumas work in 2006 with The Women’s War, an excellent, though lesser known Dumas book and Penguin saw fit to include it in their own line of Classics then.  Wouldn’t a hardcover release be something of a pleasant surprise? And isn’t it a wasted opportunity to pass over real exclusives and to merely release what every other publisher already does? Not that Penguin doesn’t have missteps, and I’ve written in great (perhaps unnerving) detail about what I think of the Richard Pevear translation of The Three Musketeers (stick with Oxford), but I’ve found it rare that Penguin ever brings in a questionable translation in all the years that I’ve been reading them; there’s been a few, but not many.

That’s why it disappoints me that from all the wonderful works that Penguin could choose from, they do the obvious, and start reaching for Austen and Dickens, incidentally two authors who never have to fear going out of print from now to eternity.  Why not make use of Monte Cristo and Dangerous Liaisons when they can’t be offered up by anyone else? It does seem wasteful.

And then I have my second complaint.

I can think of a few publishers who have made it a point to print their hardcovers on acid-free paper: chiefly, Everyman’s Library and the Library of America, but I believe that Modern Library makes a consistent effort here as well.  The usage of acid-free paper is to prevent the yellow discoloring and, often, pre-mature aging of a book, and anyone who has a library full of paperbacks knows exactly what I’m referring to.

Wikipedia has a whole page devoted to acid-free paper, but basically defines it as a “paper that has a neutral or basic pH (7 or slightly greater).”

I’m not exactly sure when I became aware of the usage, or it’s apparent importance, but it now factors into my decision-making process greatly when I purchase a book, and I tend to be disappointed if it’s not factored into my latest acquisition.  As a result, I’m picking up more and more titles specifically from Everyman’s and Library of America, but I’ve been long frustrated that I have more than a few editions of certain books that feature inferior translation work, and have secretly longed for Penguin to do a real deluxe line.  Sadly, the new Penguin hardcovers don’t appear to make use of this practice.

They do, however, seem to be a bit more green friendly, which I can also respect.  The copyright page on the new line states, “Penguin Books is committed to a sustainable future for our business, our readers and out planet.  The book in your hands is made from paper certified by the Forest Stewardship Council.” A logo is also included which states ‘mixed sources.’  Are the two practices of being environmentally friendly and using acid-free paper mutually exclusive? I’m not sure, but it would be nice to merge the two for any given book line.

(pic. 5_An old Penguin paperback, greatly loved.)

Still, I’m pleased to see Penguin make a bit of a jump with a real hardcover line for it’s classics library.  The design work looks fantastic, and, whore that I am, makes one or two purchases necessary, bank account willing.  I’m hopeful that the selection will improve, and that Penguin will use the line to differentiate itself from what other publishers are doing, perhaps even giving a few looked over works a better chance at standing out in stores, but that also means steering away from Dickens and Austen, and taking a risk on equally, if not better, books that have already received the excellent Penguin touch but languish, perhaps, in niche status.  At least Penguin gets it half right so far, and will hopefully build on an exciting new brand into the coming year.

* * *

www.penguin.com

http://us.penguingroup.com/

4 Responses to “NEWS: Penguin releases a new hardcover line from it’s ‘Classics’ imprint”

  1. It’s bizarre to see a hardcover that doesn’t use acid-free paper. Even most trade paperbacks use it. I have a hardcover chess book that’s over 500 pages, which would probably retail for $30 if it had high-quality paper, sewn binding, and cloth-bound covers, but it’s a “budget” book with a retail price of $9.99, with glued binding, cardboard covers, and cheap paper that feels like computer printout paper, and even *that* book’s paper is acid-free.

    I have some LOA and EL volumes and I love them, but I wish that EL would use the same kind of thin Bible paper that LOA uses. My EL volume with Highsmith’s first three Ripley novels is 900 pages and it’s a heavy and unwieldy doorstop compared to my longest LOA book (“Philip K. Dick: Five Novels of the 1960s and 70s”), which is 1100 pages and pleasantly light and compact. The LOA book lies flat everywhere except the very beginning and end, but the EL book doesn’t like flat even in the very middle. (It’s nothing my TV’s remote control or my checkbook can’t solve, though.)

    I’m not picky about the overall quality of books, though, probably since I take such good care of mine. I have a habit of buying paperbacks of anything that’s in the public domain, since they’re so inexpensive. I recently bought a Barnes & Noble Classics collection of Poe tales and poems for $7, choosing it over the LOA collection which costs $30 on Amazon. I also have a small collection of Dover Thrift Edition paperbacks; they look just as cheap as they cost (about $2.50), but they’re unabridged and no less classy than any other kind of paperbacks.

  2. litterbury Says:

    Hello Craig!

    You have better luck than I do when it comes to the paper of some of your books. I actually find it to be kind of a rarity to find anything that uses acid-free paper, aside from my Everyman’s and LOA books.

    Also, I’m really trying to get my library updated with most everything in hardback editions, and am drifting away from pretty much anything in paperback unless I can’t find another copy. It’s driving up the expense a bit, but my books certainly look handsome together!

    I was actually tempted to pick up the Ripley title from Everyman’s to have as a basic reading/thumbing through copy, but if that’s the case, then I don’t think I’ll be getting that one.

    I also prefer the lighter weight of the LOA releases, and find it to make for a much more comfortable reading experience. There also doesn’t seem to be much order from one book to the next with Everyman’s. The paper all seems to vary, as does the text font, and I’m still irritated that not every release has a jacket.

    Now, what I’m really looking for is a complete set of Dumas’ Musketeer saga in hardcover with acid-free paper, but I don’t think that such a set has ever been published or commissioned. In fact, the only proper set is put out by Oxford University Press, but they use that cheaper ‘newsprint’ style paper. I keep bugging Everyman’s to at least publish a copy of Twenty Years After, but they don’t seem all that interested…

    Anyway! Thank you again for your comment; I’m only not quite a month late in getting back, so my apologies. I’m curious about picking up the LOA set on Phillip K. Dick as I’ve never read anything by him, so we shall see what my budget humbly allows in the future.

  3. Craig D. Says:

    If you’re going to start reading Dick, the first LOA volume (“Four Novels of the 1960s”) is the place to start. It includes “The Man in the High Castle,” “The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch,” “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?”, and “Ubik.” Not only are these four of his best novels, they’re four of his most accessible and easy to read. All of the novels in the second volume (“Five Novels of the 1960s and 70s”) are great (“A Scanner Darkly” may be the best thing he ever wrote), but they should wait until after you’ve digested some of the more accessible stuff from the first volume.

    I think I jumped the gun on saying that “most trade paperbacks use” acid-free paper; I should have said that most of the trades that I’ve bought use it. You’re right that I seem to have good luck there.

    As far as choosing between hardcover and paperback, I’m afraid it’s just a matter of money for me. As much as I’d like to have the $15 hardcover of Kafka’s “The Trial,” the $3.50 paperback was just too tempting for someone like me — someone who has a humble income and a huge list of classics that I want to read but haven’t gotten around to. The money I saved went toward paperbacks of other classics that I had been wanting to read. The punishment for my thriftiness is having a shelf full of unimpressive paperbacks to look at, but I take such good care of my books that I don’t have to worry about any of them falling apart.

    Outside the public domain is different, though. Paperbacks of copyrighted works have gotten so expensive that the difference in price between them and hardcovers is either miniscule enough for the hardcover to be the preferred choice, or the hardcover collections are cheaper than buying individual paperbacks. Just a few examples: You can get paperbacks of Orwell’s “Animal Farm” and “1984″ for $20, or you can get a hardcover that includes both for $15. Paperbacks of the first three Ripley books will cost you $30, but the Everyman’s edition with all three runs $18. (It actually cost me more money to buy paperbacks of the last two novels!) Paperbacks of Dashiell Hammett’s five novels would have cost me over $50, but I got the LOA “Complete Novels” volume for less than $25. (Amazon, how I love thee and thy discounts.)

    It all comes down to personal preference, though. If the extra quality is worth the extra money to you, then more power to you and your fine-looking shelf. But right now, as much as I cherish my LOA and Everyman’s and other hardcover volumes, I’m fine with paperbacks.

  4. Pat Wilbourne Says:

    It does seem a bit of a change for Penguin to release hardcover bound classics.

    They coincide rather neatly with the hardcover bound series of classics from Whites Books..

    http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/uimages/sf/02.24.09%20white%27s%20books%203.jpg

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.