Archive for vampires

Twilight author Stephenie Meyer claims to be a big fan of proud homophobe Orson Card

Posted in Twilight with tags , , , , , , , , on November 26, 2009 by litterbury

I had just written a little piece on Twilight in which I detailed my casual fascination with the saga, and how, for me, it tied in with Mormonism and Proposition 8.  The piece is here:

http://litterbury.com/2009/11/23/obligatory-twilight-post/

I expressed my latent fears of supporting Twilight if there could be a potential issue of homophobia in regards to the author, Stephenie Meyer.  I just watched a Q&A clip Meyer did for Oprah.com following Meyer’s appearance on Winfrey’s talk show.  In it, Meyer raves about sci-fi writer Orson Scott Card, someone who is deeply homophobic and staunchly against the issue of same-sex marriage.  The link to the clip follows and Meyer mentions Card at about the 3:37 mark:

http://www.oprah.com/media/20091113-orig-stephenie-meyer

The Wikipedia entry for Card has a whole section on his stances of people who are gay, but I decided to pick this little nugget: “With regard to the acceptance of legal same-sex marriage in Massachusetts and California, Card writes that: “The first and greatest threat from court decisions in California and Massachusetts, giving legal recognition to ‘gay marriage,’ is that it marks the end of democracy in America. These judges are making new law without any democratic process; in fact, their decisions are striking down laws enacted by majority vote.”  And there’s much more where that came from.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orson_Card

Does this reflect poorly on Meyer’s part? Yes, it does, but there’s no direct way of knowing where she stands on gay rights from this alone, though it is troubling.

Obligatory Twilight post.

Posted in Twilight with tags , , , , , , , , on November 23, 2009 by litterbury

Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight Saga broke box office records in theaters this weekend with the second film installment of the franchise, ‘New Moon.’ Her books continue to be bestsellers, the film series is a phenomenon and she just did her first appearance on the Oprah Winfrey talk show.  Not bad.

They are a disputed success, though.  The series skews in the Young Adult-YA ghetto, the author is Mormon writing goth-lite, the romance can be viewed as syrupy, the quality of writing to some is questionable (Meyer, to her credit, qualifies herself more as a storyteller than an author) and the repressed romance can be read as an allegory of sexual abstinence.

I own all four of the books, and have read three.  I actually kind of like the Twilight books and appreciate them for what they are.  I don’t hang effigies of Anne Rice on them, or burn them in honor of horror past, and I haven’t seen the films yet, so I’m not completely tied into the wild fanfare of the moment.

I find their appeal fascinating, but in unusual fashion.

You see, when the first Twilight movie surprised everyone with box office success (shocker!), talk of Proposition 8 was going through the state of California.  Prop. 8 was a ballot initiative that would appear on the November ballots of the 2008 general election, in which Barack Obama was elected President of the US.  The California Supreme Court had previously passed down a decision months earlier which stated that the state constitution couldn’t bar same-sex couples from getting married, which led to Prop. 8 in putting the issue to vote during an election with support for the measure hoping to outlaw same-sex marriage.  Prop. 8 passed.  It was very upsetting, and there had been some trending conversations that the Mormon church had stepped in with an invested interest to  sway the outcome in favor of it’s passing.

Now, I will say that, to my knowledge, the Mormon church doesn’t specifically issue any statement in regards to a position on same-sex marriage.  Also, I’m aware that not everyone who is Mormon supports the opposition to same-sex marriage, with many, in fact, supporting gay friends, acquaintances and family members.  But, the Mormon church may have contributed funds to support the passage of Prop. 8, though it’s questionable, and I wonder if the church would knowingly support such a thing if it could put to risk it’s own tax-exempt status.

This brings me to the author of Twilight, Stephenie Meyer, who is, of course, Mormon.

Does Meyer have a personal opinion on same-sex marriage? I’m sure she does.  I’d be shocked if she was genuinely homophobic, and yet it wouldn’t surprise me either, and that lack of knowing makes me a little nervous.  I would really hate to discover that supporting Twilight would be supporting homophobia, but I would also seriously doubt if much of the young adult population that generates the cash flow for Twilight books, movies and memorabilia would be in any way homophobic in this day and age, and many probably even know of a few school peers who are gay.

It’s in regards to that where, suddenly, the Mormon church had become part of our national consciousness in two very big ways, and it wasn’t deliberately manufactured, but happened of it’s own accord as a genuine pop-cultural moment.  That dichotomy between Mormonism, gay marriage and the Twilight Saga was fascinating and the appeal for me, personally, was undeniable and I had to investigate for my own curiosity.

What I can appreciate about Twilight is it’s moody atmosphere, it’s angst-ridden teen brooding and epic romance delivered under the guise of a slow-burning crush.  It’s also one of the first times that ‘goth’ has been packaged and presented for the mainstream with a cool factor that wasn’t tied into visions of drugs, violence and delinquency.

I like Edward, too.  Having a grumpy teenage vampire who wants to get close to you but can’t because he wants it too badly, and is afraid of what he just might do to you in the process sounds like the stuff of cheap romance novels.  In Twilight? It works, and I’m amazed that no one gives Meyer any credit for her trouble, if not from a creative standpoint, then at least a lucrative one.

Typically books for the young are treated as light fiction and while many don’t pander towards those expectations, there is a definite approach to marketing good vibes and self-esteem.  Meyer embraces that, and there is a case to be made of the Twilight Saga being representative of the self-esteem movement that plays a role in shaping a lot of kids today, but she doesn’t cast out darkness in the process.  There is an underlying sense, too, that what should be viewed as bad is really wrong to hate, especially when you know that it feels so true.

I recognize that Twilight centers on matters of difference, and trying to understand the difference of others.  Judgement is not handed down, and there are no bullies at Forks High School.  You can be different, maybe even looked upon with suspicion for it, but nobody says anything bad about you, and the high-school peers of Bella and Edward are merely curious with the world around them and treat it as such.

Meyer’s representation of Forks, Washington is misty, woodsy and insulated, with a surprisingly diverse community, and residents take that community for what it is.  There is no threat to life in Forks, and it’s only when one wanders out of it’s safe confines that violence and danger become apparent, or when bad things are unleashed upon it from an outside place.  There is a spiritual current to the ferns and trees that quietly watch over it’s residents, and an almost religious authority that is not steeped in religion.  The grey, rainy sky that looms overhead feels oddly cleansing, never cold, and while it’s home, it never ultimately feels familiar.

This is obviously a world that Meyer’s young readers wished they lived in.  This is what they wish their school life could be like, and they want to be taken seriously for the romances they feel, and that their sense of self is to be taken at the value it deserves.  They don’t want to live in a world that punishes them, or their friends, for who they are, but, rather, embraces them instead.  Meyer understands this about her audience, and I can see that.

* * *

“Hmm.” Edward’s voice had a new edge to it.  “In that case, perhaps we’d better leave sooner rather than later.”

“Yes,” Aro agreed.  “That’s a good idea.  Accidents do happen.  Please wait below until after dark, though, if you don’t mind.”

“Of course,” Edward agreed, while I cringed at the thought of waiting out the day before we could escape.

“And here,” Aro added, motioning to Felix with one finger.  Felix came forward at once, and Aro unfastened the gray cloak the huge vampire wore, pulling it from his shoulders.  He tossed it to Edward.  “Take this.  You’re a little conspicuous.”

Edward put the long cloak on, leaving the hood down.

Aro sighed.  “It suits you.”

-New Moon

Pictures: The New Annotated Dracula

Posted in Dracula, Stoker with tags , , , on November 21, 2009 by litterbury

With Everyman’s Library set to include Dracula next year, it’s a good time to look at The New Annotated Dracula which saw release from W. W. Norton last year.  Coincidentally, it’s the same publishing house that released the Tom Ripley box set, and both saw release in October of 2008.

Norton has a whole series of annotated editions that cover everything from Alice in Wonderland and The Wizard of Oz, to Huck Finn and Sherlock Holmes.  The Sherlock Holmes set is edited by Leslie S. Klinger, who handled the Dracula release, and while quite good on some merits, there are other things that are a bit of a miss.

The book itself is probably the nicest edition of Dracula I’ve ever seen.  No acid-free paper with this one, and no ribbon marker, but it’s extremely detailed and handsome as a gift copy for the collector.

It clocks in at just over 600 pages, and features multiple appendixes of bonus material, including the short story by Bram Stoker, ‘Dracula’s Guest,’ as well as sections on chronology, dates and even a Whitby glossary.  In fact, there’s a whole part 2 of the book that follows even all that, plus multiple introductions and so many notes the actual text of the book can find itself rather lost with all that’s going on.  The back of the dust-jacket (which is really quite beautiful) proudly proclaims 1,500 notes and hundreds of illustrations, and I have no doubt that the book lives up it’s claims.

However, the project is so ambitious that despite it’s intentions of being thoroughly comprehensive, it makes a few judgement calls that, while not bad, are tough to stomach.

On one hand, Klinger treats the project in a manner that playfully accepts the manuscript of Dracula as fact, and thus makes notations on the text as one would treat an investigative report.  Because the novel is essentially epistolary in nature anyway, this can actually be quite fun to read, and it does open up some disturbing new implications within the story, particularly in regards to the character of Quincy P. Morris.  But can it grow tiresome after a while? It does wear itself a little thin, and some of the comments seem a little too cheeky for their own good.  My opinion is that the decision to examine the work in this manner was in fact a sound one, just one to be judged according to taste.

Which brings me to subject of being tasteful, here in regards to the loads of artwork that adorn the volume.  Another deliberate decision was made to include content that celebrates the impact and the inspiration for Dracula.  Meaning, you’re going to get some rumblings of things like Jack The Ripper, which is fair, but you’re also going to get mentions of Buffy The Vampire Slayer, and things such as a full-page reprint of the poster for the Hollywood cult classic, ‘The Lost Boys.’

I’m mixed on this issue, because there is no getting around the fact that the volume could have been more tasteful if it only kept things Dracula-specific.  The other problem is if the conscious effort has been made to show the impact of vampire lore and popularity that Dracula has inspired, it’s odd that the Castlevania video games from Konami receive no mention, despite even mentioning Dracula specifically, and it’s almost comical that Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight Saga isn’t mentioned once.  Seeing as how we are in the midst of a full-blown Twilight phenomenon, it almost seems absurd to make the omission (intended or not), and given that this volume was released in October of last year, the books themselves had already gained an enormous following rendering the omission glaring.

My problem here is that if you are, in fact, going to go all out, then just do it, but picking and choosing from some things versus others seems blatantly obvious, or shortsighted.  It’s hard to complain about getting so much bonus material, but certain things could have been handled better, such as the last pages of the novel being graced with a wild-eyed Christopher Lee complete with erect wooden stake popping out of him; I make the argument of taste here.

Still, one would be hard-pressed to find a better edition of the classic on the market, and it may be the best edition ever released.  It might also be the most complete edition released in the United States, as there has been some speculation of various manuscripts seeing print, though it may not be the first to offer the full text here in the US.  Anyone who is a fan of specifically Dracula, or just classic literature in general should get this volume, as, my differences of opinion aside, when I first got the book I spent hours just breathlessly soaking up the notes, pictures and extras.   It’s a good investment.

I should make note that Barnes and Noble released a gift volume of Stoker’s novel which featured illustrations by Edward Gorey, as well as some extras, and there have been countless other paperback releases of the work that take a more bare-bones approach.  My previous copy was actually from Signet as a movie edition to commemorate the release of the elaborate Francis Ford Coppola directed film, ‘Bram Stoker’s Dracula’ from November of 1992.  It featured a black and white photo-insert of stills and publicity shots from the film and an introduction by Leonard Wolf who had previously edited The Annotated Dracula.

UPDATE: I reread this and I just wanted to make it clear that I am impressed with the work Mr. Klinger has invested into this volume.  My critique focuses on some aesthetic directions the book takes, but I really do think that it’s a handsome volume and that the notes are extremely detailed.

Endpapers in red.

The front image on the hardcover itself, stamped and slightly embossed.

Title page design; you can expect that kind of detailing throughout.

Stoker looks rather dashing here!

And a familiar sight.

NEWS: Everyman’s Library set to include Stoker’s Dracula in May 2010

Posted in Dracula, Stoker with tags , , on November 17, 2009 by litterbury

The gothic classic by Bram Stoker, Dracula, is set for inclusion in the prestigious Everyman’s Library for May 4th 2010, as a listing on the publisher’s website states.

Dracula recently, as of October 2008, was published in a new annotated edition by W. W. Norton books, edited by Leslie S. Klinger, who had provided for the Annoted Sherlock Holmes books for Norton.  A beautiful and highly recommended copy, but it will still be nice to have an edition printed on acid-free paper with an embedded ribbon marker, which are representative of the Everyman’s Library.  It will be interesting to see the artwork for the full-color dust-jacket that Everyman’s will ultimately choose.

Suggested retail price is set at $23.00.

Everyman’s Library is a division of Random House, and is published by Alfred A. Knopf.

Their website is www.everymanslibrary.com

The listing for Dracula can be found at the following: http://www.randomhouse.com/knopf/classics/catalog/results.pperl?title_subtitle_auth_isbn=dracula

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.